Selected standard and scope
Define the boundary and intended outcome for this part of the engagement.
SUPPORT SERVICE / MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
A structured review of existing processes and documented information against selected management-system requirements.
01 / Service overview
Define the boundary and intended outcome for this part of the engagement.
Connect the activity to the organisation's actual processes and applicable requirements.
Turn observations into practical actions that can be owned and reviewed.
A structured review of existing processes and documented information against selected management-system requirements. The exact scope, deliverables, responsibilities and timing should be agreed after understanding the organisation’s context and intended outcomes.
The engagement should be proportionate to the organisation's context, selected framework, activities and available resources. Scope, deliverables and responsibilities are agreed before work begins.
02 / What this support can address
The areas below help frame the engagement. Exact activities depend on the agreed scope, organisational context and evidence available.
Understand current arrangements against selected requirements and agreed scope.
Distinguish significant gaps from improvements that can be planned over time.
Base observations on processes, records and evidence made available.
Translate findings into owners, actions and realistic target dates.
03 / Typical engagement
A typical sequence is outlined here. Activities, timing and deliverables are tailored and confirmed for each engagement.
Confirm the intended standard, edition, scope, sites and activities.
Review existing processes, records, responsibilities and controls against relevant requirements.
Record observed gaps, strengths, risks and evidence objectively.
Prioritise actions based on significance, feasibility and organisational objectives.
Agree an action plan with owners, target dates and review arrangements.
04 / Scope and responsibilities
A gap assessment is a point-in-time review, not an independent certification audit. Findings depend on the agreed scope and evidence made available. The organisation remains responsible for decisions and corrective actions.
Any applicable certification, accreditation, validation or verification decision remains with the relevant independent body. The organisation remains accountable for its own management system and operational decisions.
05 / Frequently asked questions
Answers to common questions about the scope and practical use of this support service.
The agreed scope may include document review, discussions with process owners, sampling of records and a findings report.
No. It is a diagnostic or consultancy activity. An independent certification body conducts the certification audit and makes the certification decision.
Yes. It can establish a baseline early or help evaluate an existing system.
No. It can identify readiness issues, but certification depends on implementation and independent assessment.
DISCUSS THE SCOPE
Review the standards catalogue or discuss the support required for your management system.